tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8123409644010783103.post3144039314341093039..comments2023-10-01T00:06:07.936-10:00Comments on BBO's Place: Improperly UtilizedBryanbryoilhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09463233578735448147noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8123409644010783103.post-33116849165348753762008-10-26T19:51:00.000-10:002008-10-26T19:51:00.000-10:00IMO Hemsky really never gave Penner his just due. ...IMO Hemsky really never gave Penner his just due. IMO Horcoff was the glue that held that line together. Enough of a grinder to compliment Penner, and enough skill to compliment Hemsky. <BR/><BR/>Stoll and Reasoner were by no means in the same caliber of Horcoff, but Hemsky and Penner never had a decent 2 man game going in spite of their anchors down the middle. That lines production died without #10 in the fold.Bryanbryoilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09463233578735448147noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8123409644010783103.post-18984742250582394432008-10-26T18:47:00.000-10:002008-10-26T18:47:00.000-10:00I can't disagree that Penner's been misused - for ...I can't disagree that Penner's been misused - for starters, on this team he should be a lock as the number one LW option on the powerplay, no ifs ands or buts.<BR/><BR/>Where I dod iodsagree is how he plays with Hemsky - there were sequences last year where he looked dynamite with Horcoff and 83, and I think he could again. As to separating 10 and 83, the only other centre on the team who I would trust to read Hemsky without a massive adjustment period is Gagner.Jonathan Willishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13939434026697781276noreply@blogger.com